Case #1: A 20-year-old female patient underwent breast augmentation with Sebbin silicone gel implants—round, moderate profile, 330 cc—inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach.
Case #2: A 22-year-old female patient underwent breast augmentation with Mentor silicone gel implants—round, moderate-plus profile, 300 cc—inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach.
Case #3: A 25-year-old female patient underwent breast augmentation with round Mentor silicone gel implants (moderate profile, 280 cc), inserted subglandularly via an inframammary approach.
Case #4: A 24-year-old female patient underwent breast augmentation with round Mentor silicone gel implants (moderate profile, 270 cc), inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach.
Case #5: Arion 400 cc round high-profile implants inserted subpectorally via a periareolar approach. Results 9 months after surgery.
Case #6: Round Sebbin implants, 260 cc, moderate profile, inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach. The patient 6 months post-surgery
Case #7: Arion 300 cc extra-high-profile implants inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach. Patient 7 years post-op.
Case #8: Asymmetrical tuberous breasts. Augmentation with glandular expansion—Arion round high-profile implants, 360 cc (right breast), 330 cc (left breast). Results 9 months after surgery.
Case #9: Arion 330 cc round, extra-high-profile implants, inserted subpectorally via a periareolar approach. The patient 3 weeks post-op
Case #10: Breast augmentation with Arion 330 cc high-profile silicone implants inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach; results at one and a half years post-op.
Case #11: Mentor round implants with a moderate-plus profile, 330 cc, inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach
Case #12: Breast augmentation with 350 cc Arion high-profile silicone implants inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach
Case #13: Breast augmentation with Arion 320 cc moderate-profile silicone implants inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach
Case #14: 20-year-old female patient who underwent breast augmentation with 320 cc round Arion silicone implants (moderate profile), inserted subpectorally via an inframammary incision; results at 1½ years postoperatively
Case #15: A 36-year-old female patient underwent breast augmentation with 360 cc round Arion implants (moderate profile), inserted subpectorally through an inframammary incision.
Case #16: A 28-year-old female patient underwent breast augmentation with Mentor anatomical implants—320 cc (right breast) and 290 cc (left breast)—with a Low Height, Moderate Plus profile, inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach.
Case #17: A 33-year-old female patient underwent breast augmentation with Mentor anatomical implants (330 cc, Moderate Height, Moderate Plus Profile), inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach. Results at 1 month and 3 months post-surgery.
Case #18: A 28-year-old female patient underwent breast augmentation with 380 cc round Arion Extra High Profile implants inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach; result at 2 weeks postoperatively
Case #19: A 22-year-old female patient underwent breast augmentation with 310 cc round textured Arion implants (moderate profile), inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach; result at 2 weeks postoperatively
Case #20: A 23-year-old female patient underwent breast augmentation with 350 cc round, textured Arion implants (moderate profile) inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach; result at 14 months postoperatively.