Case #81: A female patient with severe scoliosis underwent bilateral breast augmentation using 320 cc Silimed Natural anatomical implants (round-based) with a moderate profile, inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach. Result at 6 weeks postoperatively.
Case #82: Bilateral breast augmentation with 250 cc HP (high profile) round Arion implants inserted submuscularly via an inframammary approach; result at 2 months post-op.
Case #83: Breast augmentation with 385 g TSF round Natrelle Inspira high-profile implants inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach. Result at 7 weeks postoperatively.
Case #84: Breast augmentation with Mentor anatomical implants (375 cc, moderate height and moderate-plus profile) inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach; result at 3 months post-op.
Case #85: Asymmetrical tuberous breasts; bilateral breast augmentation with 400 cc Mentor round ultra-high-profile implants inserted subpectorally via an areolar approach; result at 4 months post-op.
Case #86: Tuberosus breasts, severe form. Bilateral breast augmentation with 475 cc Silimed Natural anatomical implants with a round base, inserted subglandularly via a periareolar approach; result at one and a half months postoperatively.
Case #87: Bilateral breast augmentation with Mentor anatomical 390 cc medium-height, high-profile implants inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach; result at one month post-op.
Case #88: Bilateral breast augmentation with 350 cc Mentor round high-profile implants inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach. Result at 5 weeks post-op.
Case #89: Breast augmentation with Mentor anatomical implants (260 cc, moderate height, high profile) inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach. Result at 2 months post-op.
Case #90: Bilateral breast augmentation with 345 g TSF high-profile round Natrelle implants inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach; result at 2 months post-op.
Case #91: Asymmetrical tuberous breasts. Bilateral breast augmentation with Mentor anatomical implants (345 cc, medium height, full projection) inserted subpectorally via a periareolar approach. Results at 3 months and 2 years postoperatively.
Case #92: Bilateral breast augmentation with round Natrelle Inspira 470 g TSX extra full projection implants inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach. Result at 2 months post-op.
Case #93: Bilateral breast augmentation with 345 g TSF full-projection round Natrelle Inspira implants inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach; result at one month post-op.
Case #94: Bilateral breast augmentation with 325 g TSF full-projection round Natrelle Inspira implants inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach; result at one month postoperatively.
Case #95: Bilateral breast augmentation with 325 g MX moderate-height, extra-full-projection Natrelle anatomical implants inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach; result at 2 weeks postoperatively.
Case #96: Replacement of 325 cc high-profile round Eurosilicon implants (positioned high) with 385 g TSF full-projection round Natrelle implants, inserted into the same retropectoral pocket but repositioned; result at 2 months post-op.
Case #97: Bilateral breast augmentation with 375g TSX extra full projection round Natrelle implants inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach; result at one month post-op.
Case #98 Breast augmentation with Natrelle anatomical implants: 335 g MF moderate height full projection (right) and 320 g MM moderate height moderate projection (left), inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach; results at 2 weeks and 5 months postoperatively.
Case #99: Female patient with glandular ptosis. Breast augmentation with Natrelle 375 g FF full-height, full-projection anatomical implants inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach; result at 2 months postoperatively.
Case #100: Breast augmentation with 360 cc HP high-profile Arion implants inserted subpectorally via an inframammary approach; results at 6 months post-op.