Case #1: A 25-year-old female patient with grade 3 breast ptosis underwent breast augmentation with 330 cc round Sebbin implants (moderate profile) and a simultaneous breast lift with periareolar and vertical incisions. The implants were placed under the pectoral muscle.
Case #2: Arion 380 cc round, extra-high-profile implants placed subpectorally in combination with periareolar mastopexy. The patient at 3 months
Case #3: A 24-year-old female patient with breast asymmetry (ptotic right breast, hypotrophic left breast). Left breast augmentation was performed using a 290 cc Arion round implant with a moderate profile, and right breast augmentation was performed using a 240 cc Arion round implant with a moderate profile, both procedures performed concurrently with a vertical and periareolar incision. The implants were placed under the pectoral muscle.
Case #4: A 20-year-old female patient with glandular ptosis corrected using round, high-profile Arion implants (330 cc) inserted subglandularly with concomitant periareolar lift
Case #5: Augmentation and lift with periareolar incision using round Natrelle TSM 345 g moderate-profile implants placed subpectorally. Result at 6 months post-op.
Case #6: A 20-year-old female patient with grade 3 breast ptosis underwent augmentation with Mentor implants—round, moderate-profile, 275 cc—and a simultaneous T-shaped scar breast lift. The implants were placed under the pectoral muscle. Result at 1 month post-op
Case #7: A 30-year-old female patient with severe breast asymmetry and a nipple scar on the right breast present since she was 2 months old; To achieve symmetry, right breast augmentation was performed using a 275 cc Mentor round moderate-profile implant, and left breast lift and augmentation was performed using a 225 cc Mentor round moderate-profile implant; both implants were placed subpectorally. Result at 5 weeks postoperatively.
Case #8: Female patient, 22 years old, grade 2 breast ptosis; breast augmentation and lift with 275 cc Mentor round implants (moderate-plus profile) inserted subpectorally; scar in “T” scar; result one month postoperatively.
Case #9: A 31-year-old female patient with grade 2 breast ptosis and asymmetry. bilateral breast augmentation and concomitant periareolar mastopexy were performed using round Arion implants of 360 cc (left breast) and 330 cc (right breast), placed subpectorally. Result at 2.5 months postoperatively.
Case #10: A 28-year-old female patient presented with recurrent breast ptosis following bilateral breast augmentation with 300 cc high-profile round Eurosilicone implants inserted subglandularly via a periareolar approach 3 years ago at another medical facility. A mastopexy with an inverted-T scar was performed, and the implants were repositioned from a subglandular to a subpectoral position. Result one month postoperatively.
Case #11: A 33-year-old female patient presented with recurrent breast ptosis following augmentation-mastopexy with an inverted-T scar and 300 cc high-profile round Mentor implants placed subglandularly at another medical facility 7 years ago. A re-augmentation and mastopexy was performed using an inverted T incision, and the implants were replaced with 350 cc high-profile round Mentor implants, this time inserted subpectorally. Result at 1½ months postoperatively.
Case #12: A 35-year-old female patient with grade 1–2 breast ptosis. A breast augmentation and lift was performed with a periareolar incision and 375 cc round Mentor implants with a high profile, placed subpectorally. Result at 3 months postoperatively.
Case #13: A 28-year-old female patient with asymmetrical tuberous breasts underwent periareolar breast augmentation and mastopexy using 350 cc Mentor round high-profile implants placed subpectorally. Result at 2 months post-op.
Case #14: Breast augmentation with Mentor anatomical implants (375 cc, moderate height, moderate plus profile) inserted submuscularly, combined with a periareolar breast lift. Result at 2 months post-op.
Case #15: A 30-year-old female patient with breast ptosis and 325 cc round Eurosilicone implants inserted subfascially 5 years ago. An inverted T-incision breast lift was performed, and the implants were replaced with 365 g Natrelle round high-profile TSF implants inserted submuscularly. Results at 2 months and 3 years post-op.
Case #16: Breast augmentation and lift using round Natrelle TSF implants with a high profile, 240g (right) and 220g (left), placed subpectorally with an inverted T-shaped incision. Result at one and a half months post-op.
Case #17: Ptotic, tuberous, asymmetrical breasts; pectus carinatum. The procedure involved breast augmentation and lift using inverted-T incisions and 275 cc Mentor round breast implants with a moderate profile, placed submuscularly. Result at 3½ months postoperatively.
Case #18: Periareolar mastopexy and augmentation with 350 cc Mentor round high-profile implants inserted subpectorally; results at 3 months postoperatively.
Case #19: Periareolar mastopexy and augmentation with Natrelle 360 g FX full-height, extra-full-projection anatomical implants inserted submuscularly; result at 4 months postoperatively.
Case #20: Asymmetrical tuberous breasts; augmentation mammoplasty and breast lift were performed using an inverted T incision, with 250 cc Mentor round implants (moderate plus profile) placed subpectorally. Result at 3 months postoperatively.